1 2025:CGHC:44155 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9723 of 2025 1 - Arun Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Jagdish Lal Sinha, Aged About 64 Years R/o C/o B.P. Verma, Behind Gudaku Factory, Shankar Nagar, Tahsil And Distt. Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Nagariya Prashan Awam Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director, Nagariya Prashan Awam Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director (Pension), Nagariya Prashan Awam Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner, Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.4 : Shri HB Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Shri Rakshit Tiwari, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 29.08. 202 5 1. The limited submission made by the petitioner is that with respect to discrepancies in his pension and its fixation in comparison to others, the petitioner has made his representation to the respondent No.4 on 13.06.2025 but till date no decision has been taken on the same therefore he may be permitted to make his fresh representation before the respondent No.2 who may be directed to forward the said representation to the High Powered Pension Redressal Committee Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.09.01 15:02:17 +0530 2 constituted by the State Govt. for appropriate decision in accordance with law within stipulated time frame so that the grievance of the petitioner may be redressed. 2. Learned counsel for the respective respondents have no objection if such a direction is given to the authority concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner within stipulated time period. 3. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the petitioner to make his fresh representation raising all his grievances to the respondent No.2 within two weeks from today along with copy of this order and the respondent No.2, in turn, is further directed to forward the said representation to the High Powered Pension Redressal Committee constituted by the State Govt. who shall decide the claim of the petitioner within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of fresh representation after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law on its own merit. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder