Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39982 (CHH)

BRANCH MANAGER, BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMT. MAHARANI MAL

MCC/959/2024 · 2025-01-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1853 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 959 of 2024 Branch Manager, Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office Devendra Nagar Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. Presently At 2nd Floor (Rear Side) Jeet Towers Opposite Rajkumar College, G.E. Road, Raipur, Chhattiagarh. ... Applicant (s) -Versus- 1 - Smt. Maharani Mal W/o Late Ramesh Chand Mal Aged About 38 Years R/o Subhash Nagar - Bhagwanpur, P.S. Gandhi Nagar, Tehsil - Ambikapur District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rahulchand Mal S/o Late Ramesh Chand Mal Aged About 19 Years R/o Subhash Nagar - Bhagwanpur, P.S. Gandhi Nagar, Tehsil - Ambikapur District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rohitchand Mal S/o Late Ramesh Chand Mal Aged About 17 Years Respondent No. 3 Is Minor And He Is Through His Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Maharani Mal W/o Late Ramesh Chand Mal. --- R/o Subhash Nagar - Bhagwanpur, P.S. Gandhi Nagar, Tehsil - Ambikapur District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Nalendra Kumar Yadav S/o Dinbandhu Yadav, Aged About 26 Years R/o Takiyaroad, Ambikapur, P.S. And Tehsil - Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN 2 5 - Ajay Kumar Singh S/o Chandrdeo Singh R/o Thanganpara, Ambikapur, P.S. And Tehsil - Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant(s) : Ms. Srishti Upadhyay, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 10/01/2025 1. This is an application for restoration of MAC No. 496 of 2017, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 22.08.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that due to unavoidable reasons, she could not appear before this Court, when the matter was called for hearing. She would further submit that there is legal issue involved in the miscellaneous appeal. Therefore, the same may be restored in its original number. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Therefore, the MAC No. 496 of 2017 is restored to its original number. 4. Accordingly, the present MCC is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved