Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39976 (RAJ)

CHETAN PRAJAPATI S/O SHRI SURYA PRAKASH BALOTIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15410/2025 · 2025-11-21

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15410/2025 Chetan Prajapati S/o Shri Surya Prakash Balotiya, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 52A, Brij Badi, Nangal Jaisa Bohara, Po Jhotwara District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of Technical Education Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus, Jaipur. 3. The President, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus, Jaipur. 4. Commissioner, Department Of Skilled Planning And Entrepreneurship Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. This writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- It is, therefore, most humbly prayed before this Hon’ble Court that the appropriate writ, order or direction be issued to the prescribed authority, and the present petition may kindly be allowed and the respondent be directed: I. The impugned rejection letter dated 04.07.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside; [2025:RJ-JP:47327] (2 of 2) [CW-15410/2025] II. The respondents may kindly be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Jr. Instructor (Refrigeration and AC) in terms of advertisement dated 11.03.2024 under OBC (NCL); III. Any other writ or direction that the Court deems fit, just and proper may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ petition has been squarely covered by the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in case of Komal Kumawat & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16312/2024) passed on 28.05.2025. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /35