APHC010509332024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26474/2024 Between: 1. ARJA ROOP KUMAR, S/O SRI DAMODARA RAO, HINDU, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO. 78, ROAD NO.2, SRINIVASA NAGAR BANK COLONY, VIJAYAWADA - 520 008 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (GENERAL-A) DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA - 520 002 3. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SOUTH, POLICE COMMISSIONARATE, VIJAYAWADA - 520 002 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 5 TOWN POLICE STATION, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA - 520 011 5. BORRA SUBRAMANYAM, S/O SRI RAMAKRISHNA, R/O DOOR NO. 5-7/8-56/98, RAJIV SHARMA NAGAR, CHITTI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 520 001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 respondents in summoning the petitioner and his family members to Police Station and bringing pressure on the petitioner to come to terms with the unofficial respondent in respect of financial transactions between them as illegal, arbitrary and violative of his fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the civil disputes in between petitioner and the unofficial respondent forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to summon the petitioner and his family members to the Police Station for settling the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MOHANNAIR RAJEEV KUMAR 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioner and his family members to Police Station and bringing pressure on the petitioner to come to terms with the unofficial respondent in respect of financial transactions between them as illegal, arbitrary and violative of his fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the civil disputes in between petitioner and the unofficial respondent forthwith and pass...…” 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.12.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 112 W.P.No.26474 of 2024 Dated 20.12.2025 MH