Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36269 WP No. 9320 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.9320 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
SMT. SHWEHTA D RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, W/O GIRISH GANGANAGAIAH PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT NO.45, SFS 407, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN BENGALURU – 560 064
CURRENTLY RESIDING AT NO.5071, 5TH TOWER, PRESTIGE ROYAL GARDEN, DODDABALLAPUR ROAD, AVALAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 064 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHWEHTA D RAO, PETITIONER)
AND:
SRI. GIRISH GANGANAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O GANGANAGAIAH RESIDING AT NO.136 2ND BLOCK, 10TH CROSS R T NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 032 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. G. K. BHAVANA., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) GRANT A WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU DATED JANUARY 24, 2025 ANNEXURE-A, ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1, FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36269 WP No. 9320 of 2025
G & WC NO.44/2024 THEREBY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION AND RESTORING CUSTODY OF THE MINOR CHILD TO THE PETITIONER; b) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE ABOVE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
On 10.09.2025 this Court has passed an order permitting the learned counsel for the petitioner to retire from the case and the counsel had filed a memo for producing copy of the whatsapp communication dated 29.08.2025 and 09.09.2025 sent to the petitioner where the counsel has informed the party about the matter being listed before the Court and for filing a memo for retirement.
2. The said memo discloses that it is communicated to the party and the party is aware of the pending proceedings.
3. This Court has directed the Registry to print the name of the party and list the matter today. Today, there is no
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36269 WP No. 9320 of 2025
representation on behalf of the party nor she has engaged the advocate. In these circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
RJ