Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39962 (RAJ)

RAMESH KUMAR SAINI S/O NIRANJAN LAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15575/2025 · 2025-10-13

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41782] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15575/2025 Ramesh Kumar Saini S/o Niranjan Lal Saini, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Dhani Jairampura Wali, Post Nangal Bhim, Srimadhopur, Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department (Primary Education), Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Elementary Edu.), Raj. Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “By an appropriate writ, order or direction the action of respondent authority whereby petitioner has been denied for the benefits that had already been given to similar situated persons, may kindly be quashed and set aside. By an appropriate writ, order or direction petitioner’s appointment may kindly be relate back to the date of candidate below to him in order of merit, were appointed with all consequential benefits and consequently authority be direction [2025:RJ-JP:41782] (2 of 2) [CW-15575/2025] to revise all the benefits that have been given considering his date of appointment as 19.03.2012.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17217/2023 Sitaram Yadav and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Govind Das Vaishnav and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. SB CWP No.1798/2012 (order dated 26.05.2014). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid judgment. 3. Mr. Prakhar Jain on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of judgment in case of Govind Das Vaishnav and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (Supra) and followed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17217/2023 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /110