BHARAT NANDA AND ANR. v. U.O.I.TH.SECY.MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND ANR.
WP(C)/2112/2019 · 2025-08-12
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3995 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3995 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 2112/2019 CM No. 4384/2019
Bharat Nanda And another …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Union of India and another
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sumant Soodhan, Advocate vice Mr. vishal Sharma, DSGI
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 12.08.2025
The record reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last three consecutive days and same is the position today as well. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition. The instant writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 12.08.2025 Nikhil
Sr. No. 45