[2025:RJ-JP:40658] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 171/2025 Bhuramal Ujjaniya S/o Shri B.R. Ujjaniya, Aged About 52 Years, Working As Manager (F And A), Rajasthan State Mines And Minerals Ltd., Sadul Club, Sbu And Pc (Gypsum), Bikaner. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Mines And Minerals Ltd., Through Its Chairman, C-89-90, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 2. The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Mines And Minerals Ltd., Corporate Office, 4-Meera Marg, Udaipur. 3. The Chief (Personnel And Administration), Rajasthan State Mines And Minerals Ltd., Corporate Office, 4-Meera Marg, Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/10/2025 1. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner for seeking recall and review of order dated 14.08.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3702/2008. 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the review-petitioner that the points which were pleaded in the writ petition have not been considered in order dated 14.08.2025, which has crept in error apparent on the face of record. 3. I have perused order dated 14.08.2025. Bare perusal of order would reveal that the order has been passed on the basis of facts admitted by the then counsel in the writ petition. [2025:RJ-JP:40658] (2 of 2) [WRW-171/2025] 4. Para Nos.2 & 3 of order dated 14.08.2025 are being reproduced hereunder:- "2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier ignoring his seniority one Mr. M.L. Koolwal promoted on the post of Manager (Finance) however, when the petitioner raised his grievances, aforesaid Mr. M.L. Koolwal was also reverted from the Post of Manager (Finance) to the post of Deputy Manager. Later on, the petitioner was promoted on the post of Manager (Finance) vide order dated 20.10.2007 with effect from 30.12.2006. 3. It has been admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no person junior to him was promoted earlier to him on the post of Manager (Finance) and there was no rule or regulation prevailing in the respondent-Corporation for conferring automatic promotion on acquiring eligibility for promotion." 5. Affidavit of the counsel, who had argued the matter has not been filed along with the review petition to controvert that such statements have not been made during the course of hearing of the writ petition. 6. In the aforesaid circumstances, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record. 7. Hence, the instant review petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /8