Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39937 (AP)

VALLAIBI SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

WP/23658/2021 · 2025-10-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010386022021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23658/2021 Between: 1. VALLAIBI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. V. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.VATSAVAI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SMT. VALLABI ANURADHA, W/O. V. SRINIVAS RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. VATSAVAI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VATSAVAI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. RAMAMADUGU KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O. R. VENKATESHWAR RAO @ GUMMADI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. CHILLAKALLU VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 1 in conducting civil panchayats in Police Station and for such purpose summoning the Petitioners to the Police Station and disturbing the personal liberty of the Petitioners without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and beyond jurisdiction and violation of the Article 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 1 not to conduct civil panchayat in the Police Station by using coercive methods in respect of the land extent of Ac. 2-82 cents in Sy. No. 95 of Vatsavai Village and Mandal, Krishna District and not to disturb the personal liberty of the Petitioners without following due process of law and in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 1 not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station without following due process of law for conducting civil panchayat in the Police Station in respect of the land extent of Ac. 2-82 cents in Sy. No. 95 of Vatsavai Village and Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23658 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 1 in conducting civil panchayats in Police Station and for such purpose summoning the Petitioners to the Police Station and disturbing the personal liberty of the Petitioners without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and beyond jurisdiction and violation of the Article 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 1 not to conduct civil panchayat in the Police Station by using coercive methods in respect of the land extent of Ac. 2-82 cents in Sy. No. 95 of Vatsavai Village and Mandal, Krishna District and not to disturb the personal liberty of the Petitioners without following due process of law and in the interest of justice.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23658 of 2021 Dated.29.10.2025 UPS 192