Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39931 (CHH)

SURENDRA SETH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3702/2019 · 2025-04-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:16542 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3702 of 2019 Surendra Seth S/o Shri Bhagwan Seth Aged About 70 Years R/o Village & Post Rohina, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Rohina, Janpad Panchayat Basna, Civil & Revenue District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional officer (Revenue) Saraypali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 4- Chief Executive officer Janpad Panchayat Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan P&ey Order on Board 08.04.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. -2- 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan P&ey) Judge Nadim