1 2025:CGHC:42643 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4514 of 2025 1 - Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Tarvarpur District Mungeli (Registration No. 1450) Through Authorized Officer / In Charge Samiti Manager Narendra Kumar Sahu, Son Of Shri Sev Prakash Sahu, Aged 30 Years, R/o Sahupara Fastpur Tilli, Tehsil And District Mungeli C.G. 2 - President, Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Tarwarpur, District Mungeli (Registration No. 1450) Lalaram Sahu, S/o Shri Kheduram Sahu, Aged 56 Years, R/o Village Dabo, Post Fastpur, Tehsil And District Mungeli C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Co- Operative Societies, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Commissioner And Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur C.G. 3 - Assistant Commissioner And Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mungeli Collectorate Premises, Room No. 224, 228, Dist. Mungeli C.G 4 - Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Old Joint Building, Opposite Collectorate, Bilaspur C.G. 5 - Collector, District Mungeli C.G. 6 - Netram Sahu S/o Niranjan Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Silli, Tehsil And District Mungeli C.G. ... Respondent(s) 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners : Mr. Syed AH Rizvi, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Rishab Bisen, PL. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 22.08.2025 1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Directive Letter dated 04/07/2025 (Ann. P-5) and the Show Cause Notice dated 30/07/2025 (Ann. P-7) both issued by Respondent No.3. 10.2 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2, the Commissioner, to forthwith entertain and decide the appeal of the Petitioners on its merits in a time-bound manner. 10.3 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to maintain the status quo regarding the employment of Shri Netram Sahu (Respondent No.6) until the final disposal of the disciplinary proceedings and the criminal case against him. 10.4 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other order or direction that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners -Samithi contended that on 05.06.2025, a letter was received by the petitioners -Samithi from respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner, which mentioned the application given by respondent no.6 to the Hon'ble Chief Minister Chhattisgarh Government regarding getting legal justice. The said letter was replied by the Samiti on 30.06.2025 and requested that respondent No.6 is of criminal nature, hence, his application 3 should be rejected and disposed of. When the Samiti resisted, the Assistant Commissioner issued a show cause notice dated 30.07.2025 threatening to remove the Samiti's management. Thereafter, a statutory appeal was filed against the impugned letter and show cause notice before the Commissioner/respondent No.2, but he deliberately refused to entertain the same, hence, the petitioners have come-up before this Court with aforesaid prayer. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that respondent-authority has not taken any punitive action or passed any order against him, hence, writ petition deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Relevant portion of order dated 04.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bilaspur reads as under: “1. अधीनस्थ न्यायालया के मू ल अभिलख के अवलकेन से याह स्पष्ट ह के अधीनस्थ न्यायालया द्वारा प्रथमू दृष्टया वद, वद के पक्ष मू" पया। जि%सेके केराण याह ह के वद के वद पत्र एव) से)लग्न दस्ताव% से प्रथमू दृष्टया याह परिरालभिक्षता ह राह ह के प्रतितावद द्वारा प्रथमिमूके के0 ति1 सेख सेहकेरा सेमिमूतिताया2 के लिलए %रा सेव तिनयामू के पलन तिकेया ति4न ह वद के सेव से प0थके तिकेया गया ह। से6तिवधी के से)ता6लन ताथ अप %7नया क्षतिता के लिसेधी)ता वद के पक्ष मू" ह। इसे आधीरा परा अधीनत्या न्यायालया न वद के पक्ष मू" स्थगन आदश परिराता तिकेया, जि%सेमू केई वधीतिनके त्र6टी नह> पया गया। 2. अधीनस्थ न्यायालया द्वारा %रा प्रश्नाधीन के आधीरा2 के ख)डन मू" प्रतितावद द्वारा अपन अपल ज्ञापन मू" जि%न ताथ्या2 के लख तिकेया गया ह उसेके सेमूथDन मू" केई सेक्ष्या / दस्ताव% प्रस्ता6ता नह> तिकेया गया ह। उपराक्ता तिववचन से मूH इसे तिनष्के1D परा पहुं)चता हूँL तिके अधीन न्यायालया द्वारा %रा प्रश्नाधीन आदश तिवमिधी से)गता ह। अताM अपलथ7 के अपल खरिरा% तिकेया %ता ह। 4 अधीनस्थ न्यायालया द्वारा %रा प्रश्नाधीन अ)तारिरामू आदश ह अ)तितामू आदश %रा हन श1 ह, अपलथ7 अपल ज्ञापन मू" उल्लखिखता ताथ्या2 के अधीनस्थ न्यायालया के सेमूक्ष राख केरा सेक्ष्या प्रस्ता6ता केरा सेकेता ह। अधीनस्थ न्यायालया के मू ल अभिलख के अवलकेन से स्पष्ट ह के उत्तरावद द्वारा अधीनस्थ न्यायालया के सेमूक्ष प्रस्ता6ता सेव वद प्रकेराण क्रमू)के 55 (2)/51/2022 मू" प्रतितावद के %व4, वद प्रश्ना2 के तिनधीDराण, वद सेक्ष्या प्रस्ता6ता ह च6के ह ताथ दिदन)के 20.12.2022 के अपलथ7 के तिवरुद्ध एकेपक्षया केयाDवह के गया ह। अताM अधीनस्थ न्यायालया द्वारा प्रकेराण क्रमू)के 55(2)/51/2022 परिराता अ)तारिरामू आदश दिदन)के 22.02.2022 के स्थिस्थरा राख %ता ह ताथ न्यायातिहता मू" अधीनस्थ न्यायालया के न्यायातिहता मू" तिनदVलिशता तिकेया %ता ह के अपलथ7 के वद सेक्ष्या के प्रतितापराक्षण केरान, अपन सेक्ष्या प्रस्ता6ता केरान के प6नM अवसेरा दता हुंए प्रतितावद सेक्ष्या के प्रतितापराक्षण केराकेरा उया पक्ष के अ)तितामू ताकेD से6नन के पश्चाताX ग6ण- द1 के आधीरा परा अ)तितामू आदश परिराता केरा"।" 6. Considering facts of the case, nature of reliefs/prayer, submissions of counsel for the parties, order dated 04.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) & letter dated 25.07.2024 (Annexure P-2) and other material available on record, particularly the fact that there is no punitive action or order passed against the petitioner by the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bilaspur, therefore, there is no good ground to entertain this writ petition. 7. Accordingly, writ petition is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-