Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39906 (CHH)

MOBINUDDIN v. CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,

WPC/3740/2019 · 2025-04-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19036 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3737 of 2019 • Radhe Shyam Tondre S/o Shri Mansaram Tondre Aged About 53 Years R/o House No. J - 725 Janta Colony Gudiyari, Tahsil Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner Versus 1. Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Through Its Chairman, Headquarters, Prawas Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board Division - 1, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Competent Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division Raipur, Sector - 2, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Estate Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division Raipur, Sector - 2, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents And WPC No. 3740 of 2019 • Mobinuddin S/o Late Moinuddin Aged About 49 Years R/o Chandni Chowk, Kohka, Bhilai Nagar, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1. Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Through Its Chairman, Headquarters, Prawas Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division - 1, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Competent Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division Raipur, Sector - 2, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Estate Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division Raipur, Sector - 2, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sanjya Pantel, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/04/2025 1. Mr. Ashok Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that dispute between the parties have already been settled and thus, these petitions have become infructuous. 2. Mr. Sanjay Patel, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would endorse the submission made by Mr. Ashok Patil. 3. Recording the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, these petitions are dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti