Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69298 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32879 of 2012 Petitioner :- Hafizur Rahman Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Otherss Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Khare,Siddhartha Khare Counsel for Respondent :- Paritosh Kumar Malviya Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Kauntey Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Ashish Kumar Nagwanshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and Sri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, Advocate for Respondent-5. 2. Petitioner was non suited as his experience certificate was considered to be a forged document on basis of statement of Principal of concerned Madarsa and, therefore, petitioner’s appointment on the post of Headmaster of respondent Madarsa was set aside vide order dated 16.04.2012. 3. Aforesaid order was subject matter of challenge in Writ-A No. 20631 of 2012, which was disposed of vide order dated 27.04.2012 and the said order is reproduced hereinafter: “This petition is directed against an order of the Committee of Management of Madarsa Aljameatul Islamia Tilakhara, Shivpati Nagar, District Siddharth Nagar which is an aided and recognized Madarsa. Under the order impugned, the Committee of management of the Madarsa has decided to dismiss the petitioner after holding a departmental enquiry, after finding him guilty of the charges levelled against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised various grounds for challenging the order. On behalf of the respondents it is stated that under Rule 34 of the Arbi tatha Farsi Madarsa Mandatory Niyamawali, 1987, power of visitation has been conferred upon the Inspector/Registrar, Arbi and Farsi Madarsa and, therefore, the petitioner may be relegated to the remedy so provided. Reference in that regard is made to the judgment of this Court in the case of "Mohd. Saleem Vs. Committee of Management Madarsa Rafiqul Islam, Gaura Badshahpur And others" Special Appeal No. 80 of 2010. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may first approach the Inspector/Registrar Arbi tatha Farsi Madarsa Board for ventilating his grievance at the first instance. It is provided that if such representation is filed by the petitioner within one week along with a certified copy of this order, the Registrar of the Board shall decide the same in accordance with law by means of a reasoned speaking order after affording opportunity to the management of the petitioner preferably within four weeks thereafter. Since the vacancy has already been advertised, it is further provided that any selection/appointment made in the meantime shall abide by the orders to be passed by the Registrar as indicated above. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.” 4. In aforesaid circumstances, petitioner has filed a representation before Registrar, U.P. Madarsa Shiksha Parishad and in support of his claim that experience certificate was genuine, specific averments were made in paras 16 and 18 of representation. For reference the same are reproduced hereinafter: “(16) तत्समय वरर 1990 मम मदरससे कको ककससी प्रककार ककी सरककारसी मदद नहहीं कमलतसी थसी। दकान / चन्दसे ससे प्रकाप्त आमदनसी ससे हसी मदरससे कसे कशिक्षककों /कमरचकाररयकों कको मकाममूलसी तनख्वकाह दसी जकातसी थसी तथका पढ़नसे वकालसे बच्चकों कसे हकास्टल कका भसी खचर चलकायका जकातका थका ऐससी सस्थकत मम ममुझसे पढ़कानसे कसे सकाथ -सकाथ आकफिस कसे सभसी ककायर करनसे पड़तसे थसे। मसेरसे मदरससे कसे शसी जलकालमुदसीन ससंस्थकापक प्रधकानकाचकायर तथका शसी ममुश्तकाक अहमद ससंस्थकापक प्रबसंधक थसे। शसी जलकालमुदसीन प्रधकानकाचकायर पद ससे कदनकासंक 30 जमून 2010 कको ससेवका कनववृत्त हको गयसे। शसी जलकालमुदसीन तत्ककालसीन प्रधकानकाचकायर दकारका कदनकासंक 15 जमून 2010 कको स्वयसं कसे अपनसे हस्तलसेख ( Hand Writing) ससे ममुझसे 1990 ससे 1 अप्रप्रैल 96 तक आललयका दजर मम पढ़कानसे कका अनमुभव प्रमकाण -पत्र कनगरत ककयका गयका, चमूचूँकक मदरससे मम आललयका दजर मम पढ़कानसे कका ककायर ससंस्थकापक प्रबसंधक एवसं प्रधकानकाचकायर ककी दसेखरसेख मम मसेरसे दकारका ककयका गयका थका इसललयसे ससंस्थकापक प्रबसंधक दकारका उक्त प्रमकाण पत्र ककी तस्दसीक (प्रमकाकणत) ककी गई। यह ककायर अनमुभव प्रमकाण पत्र कत्तई ततौर पर कववकाद रकहत हप्रै। ककायर अनमुभव प्रमकाण पत्र यकाकचकका कसे Annexure No. 23 पर दृष्टव्य हप्रै। (18) वतरमकान प्रबसंधक दकारका अपनसे चयकनत हकोनसे कसे पश्चकात हसी अपनसे ककससी सगसे कको प्रधकानकाचकायर पद पर यसेन कसे न प्रककारसेण हमम हटकाकर उससे प्रधकानकाचकायर बनकानसे पर आमकादका हको गयसे। इसकसे ललयसे उन्हकोनम ससंस्थकापक प्रधकानकाचकायर शसी जलकालमुदसीन कसे फिजर्जी हस्तकाक्षरकों ससे एक पत्र तप्रैयकार ककयका कक मसेरसे अध्यकापन ककायर अनमुभव कका प्रमकाण पत्र उनकसे दकारका जकारसी नहहीं ककयका गयका हप्रै जबकक ममुझसे प्रधकानकाचकायर पद ससंस्थकापक प्रधकानकाचकायर शसी जलकालमुदसीन ससे हसी प्रकाप्त हहआ थका। ऐससी सस्थकत मम ससंस्थकापक प्रबसंधक तथका प्रधकानकाचकायर ककी आचूँखकों कसे सकामनसे उनककी दसेख-रसेख मम मसेरसे दकारका ककयका गयका दमूकरत मसंशिका ससे कमू टरकचत पत्र दकारका कववकाकदत बनकानसे कका प्रयकास ककयका गयका जको पमूणरतयका झमूठका एवसं असत्य हप्रै।" 5. Petitioner was provided all relevant documents by Registrar and accordingly 18.06.2012 was fixed for hearing. However, by means of impugned order dated 22.06.2012 representation of petitioner was rejected mainly relying on the earlier version without application of any independent mind. 6. In this regard, the argument of learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioner has substance that in impugned order petitioner’s version has not even noted or considered and only on basis of a report which states the earlier version, impugned order was passed. No opportunity was provided to petitioner to place his case before said authority. For reference relevant part of impugned order is reproduced hereinafter: "शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान दकारका उपलब्ध करकायसे गयसे शिप्रैकक्षक अनमुभव कसे अनमुसकार उनकसे दकारका मदरसका अल जकाकमयकातमुल इस्लकाकमयका कतलकहनका कशिवपकतनगर लसदकाथर नगर मम 01.01.1990 ससे 01.04.1996 तक आललयका स्तर कका कशिक्षण ककायर ककयका गयका। प्रवन्धसकमकत दकारका गकठत आरकोपकों कसे सम्बन्ध मम प्रबसंधसकमकत कको सम्बकोलधत शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान नसे अपनसे पत्र कदनकासंक 25.11.2011 कसे मकाध्यम ससे अकभलसेखसीय सकाक्ष्यकों ककी मकासंग ककी. लजसकसे सम्बन्ध मम अपनसे पत्र मदरसका उपरकोक्त नसे पत्र एम /63/11 कदनकासंक 30.11.2011 कसे मकाध्यम ससे शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कको 6 सप्तकाह कसे भसीतर उत्तर प्रस्तमुत करनसे हसेतमु कनदरकशित ककयका। परन्तमु शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान उपसस्थत नहहीं हहयसे। तदकोपरकासंत दप्रैकनक समकाचकार पत्र रकोजनकामका रकाष्टषसीय सहकारका उदमूर कदनकासंक 16.12.2011. अमर उजकालका कदनकासंक 17.12.2011 तथका स्वतसंत्र चसेतनका कदनकासंक 17.12.2011 मम कवजकापन प्रककाकशित करतसे हहयसे शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कको जकासंच सकमकत कसे समक्ष उपसस्थत हकोकर जवकाव प्रस्तमुत करनसे हसेतमु कनदरकशित ककयका गयका। तत्पश्चकात कदनकासंक 15.03.2012 कको जकासंच ककायरवकाहसी समकाप्त कर दसी गई। कदनकासंक 03.04.2012 कको तसीन सदस्यसीय सकमकत नसे अपनसी जजॉच ररपकोटर मम शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कसे कवरुद लगकायसे गयसे आरकोपकों मम ससे 2 व 3 कको लसद गयका। आरकोप पत्र प्रबन्धसकमकत ककी बप्रैठक कदनकासंक 16.12.2011 एवसं 15.02.2012 दकारका अनमुमकोकदत हप्रै। तत्पश्चकात प्रबन्धक मदरसका उपरकोक्त नसे पत्रकासंक एम /102/12 कदनकासंक 16.04.2012 कसे मकाध्यम ससे जकासंच सकमकत ककी जकासंच ररपकोटर कदनकासंक 03.04.2012 मम शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कसे कवरूद आरकोकपत ककयसे गयसे तथ्यकों कको सहसी पकायका एवसं शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान दकारका ककोई भसी बचकाव व तकर प्रस्तमुत न ककयसे जकानसे कको पमूणर रूपसेण सहमकत मकानतसे हहयसे प्रबन्ध सकमकत कसे कनणरय कदनकासंक 08.04.2012 कसे क्रम मम बखकारस्त करतसे हहयसे प्रकरण कका असंकतम रूप ससे कनस्तकारण कर कदयका गयका। इस प्रककार स्पष्ट हप्रै कक शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान नसे मदरसका अल जकामसेअतमुल इस्लकाकमयका कतलकहनका , पको० कशिवपकतनगर, लसदकाथरनगर मम प्रधकानकाचकायर कसे पद पर कनयमुकक्त कसे समय जको अनमुभव प्रमकाण पत्र प्रस्तमुत ककयका थका वह पमूणरतययः फिजर्जी हप्रै। अतयः इस फिजर्जी अनमुभव प्रमकाणपत्र पर कनयमुकक्त पकानका , उसपर बनसे रहनका पमूणरतयः गप्रैरककानमूनसी हप्रै एवसं इस आधकार पर प्रबन्धक मदरसका दकारका शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कको बखकारस्त ककयका जकानका पमूणरतयः कवलध सम्मत हप्रै। उपरकोक्त ससे स्पष्ट हप्रै कक अपचकारसी कमरचकारसी कसे कवरूद ससेवका समकाकप्त ककी ककायरवकाहसी करतसे समय मदरसका मकान्यतका एवसं ससेवका कनयमकावलसी 1987 ककी धकारका - 33 एवसं 34 कका कवलधक रूप ससे पमूणररूपसेण अनमुपकालन करतसे हहयसे यकाचसीकतकार शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कको समुनवकाई कका यमुकक्तयमुक्त अवसर प्रदकान करतसे हहए शसी हफिकीजमुररहमकान कसे कवरूद बखकारस्तगसी आदसेशि कदनकासंक 16.04.2012 पकाररत ककयका गयका हप्रै लजसमम ककससी प्रककार कसे हस्तक्षसेप ककी आवश्यकतका नहहीं हप्रै।" 7. Learned counsels appearing for respondents submit that during pendency of this writ petition on basis of a fresh advertisement appointment has already been made, therefore, at this stage, no relief cant be granted to petitioner. 8. In reply to above submission, learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioner submits that this Court has passed following order on 10.07.2012: “Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent nos. 1,2,3, and 4 and Sri M.D. Misra, Advocate along with Sri Paritosh Malviya, advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no.5. Each one of the respondents is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter. List after eight weeks. Any action taken during this period, shall abide by final order to be passed by this court.” 9. He further submits that such appointment, if any, shall abide by final order to be passed in this writ petition. 10. In aforesaid circumstances, the Court is of the view that consideration of representation of petitioner by concerned respondent is only an eye wash. The contention of petitioner is not even referred in impugned order. Contents of representation were also not considered and only on basis of earlier documents, specifically the letter of Principal of erstwhile Madarsa that experience certificate was not genuine, impugned order was passed. This approach being erroneous, therefore, illegality is perpetuated. 11. In aforesaid circumstances, the Court is of the view that observations made in impugned order dated 22.06.2012 that petitioner was provided complete opportunity of hearing, is contrary to record. 12. In view of above, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 22.06.2012 is hereby set aside and matter is remitted back to concerned respondent to pass a fresh order within a period of four weeks from today, after giving opportunity of hearing to petitioner and for that petitioner shall appear before Registrar, Uattar Pradesh Madarsa Shiksha Parishad on 15th May, 2025. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 AK Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad