Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39902 (JHR)

JISU MURMU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/7485/2025 · 2025-12-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:37913 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.7485 of 2025 ----- Jisu Murmu, S/o Matal Murmu, R/o Kouribahiyar, P.O. Kouribahiyar, P.S. Poraiyahat, District Godda, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Director, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand 3.The Civil surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Godda 4.The In-charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Meharma, Godda … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Durga C. Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate …...... 02/ 17.12.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “For issuance of appropriate writ or writs, direction or directions commanding upon the respondents to fix and pay the pension to the petitioner by granting 1st MACP as the petitioner was appointed on 29.12.2005 on the post of Peon and he superannuated from his service on 31.08.2024, but till date the petitioner has neither provided the benefits of 1st MACP nor pension has been fixed nor the provisional pension has been given to him. And For issuance of appropriate writ or writs, direction or directions commanding upon the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, which was filed for fixation of his pension and payment of pension. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pension of the petitioner has not yet been fixed nor he has been granted any benefit. 4. After hearing the parties, I find that the entitlement of petitioner is first to be assessed. Thus, I direct the petitioner to approach the respondent No.3- Civil surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Godda by filing a representation within four weeks from today. If such an application is filed, an appropriate decision will be taken and a reasoned order should be passed within a period of six weeks. 5. If it found that petitioner is entitled for any relief, the same should be extended to the petitioner within four weeks thereafter. 6. If the claim of the petitioner is turned down for any reasons, the reasoned order should be communicated to the petitioner with the aforesaid period. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 17th December, 2025 R.S./ Uploaded on 19.12.2025