[2025:RJ-JP:50144] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13081/2025 1. Tularam S/o Pappu Ram, R/o Kanjipura Tehsil Bansur District Kotputali Behror, Rajasthan. (Accused In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas) 2. Sabid S/o Zaikam, R/o Utwal Tan Alwar District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Accused In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/12/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.184/2025 registered at Police Station Tatarpur, District-Khairthal-Tijara for offences under Sections 8 and 20 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. As per the prosecution story, a total of 20.420 kg of ganja was recovered from the accused-petitioners. It is submitted that the commercial quantity of ganja is 20 kg and the recovered contraband exceeds the commercial quantity by 420 grams only. It is further submitted that the weight of the contraband was measured along with the packaging material; therefore, the actual recovered [2025:RJ-JP:50144] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13081/2025] contraband is below the commercial quantity. Petitioners are behind the bars since 19.09.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the contraband appears to have been weighed along with the packaging material, having impact of marginally higher than commercial quantity, therefore, in the opinion of this Court, the conditions enumerated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are duly satisfied in the present case. 6. Thus, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Tularam S/o Pappu Ram and Sabid S/o Zaikam shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR ),J Arun/54