[2025:RJ-JP:37638] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4420/2019 1. Jyoti Sharma W/o Sunil Kumar D/o Shri Ratan Lal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Tajsar, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Sikar, At Present Ward No. 31, Near Bhatra Ki Baghichi, Fatehpur, District Sikar. 2. Sunil Kumar S/o Parmeshwar Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 31, Near Bhatra Ki Baghichi, Fatehpur, District Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Sikar. 3. Sho, Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar 4. Ratan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Hari Prasad Sharma, R/o Village Tajsar, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Sikar. 5. Ankit Sharma S/o Ratan Lal Sharma, R/o Village Tajsar, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Sikar. 6. Ashok Sharma S/o Sanwar Mal Sharma, R/o Village Tajsar, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Priyank Dixit, Adv. for Mr. Veerendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 16/09/2025 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking protection from respondent Nos.4 to 6. 2. As per the marriage certificate dated 10.07.2019 annexed with the present petition, petitioner Nos.1 & 2 have solemnized [2025:RJ-JP:37638] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4420/2019] their marriage on 10.07.2019, however, their marriage was not aggreable to respondent Nos. 4 to 6, therefore, this petition seeking protection has been filed. 3. Vide order dated 18.07.2019 passed by Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court, respondents were directed not to cause any harm to the petitioners. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 13.08.2023, which is taken on record. 5. As per the factual report, petitioners have submitted an application before the SHO, Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar stating therein that now the family members of the petitioners have agreed to accept the marriage of the petitioners and now they have no apprehension of any danger to their life and liberty, therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 7. Stay application and all other pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /35