Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39893 (AP)

Atluri Venkateswara Rao, v. Sri. Gopala Krishna Dwivedi,

CC/77/2022 · 2025-12-04

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010013632022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 77/2022 Between: 1. ATLURI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, 60Y, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. JAGGAYYAPETA TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTIRCT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI, S/O NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS COMMISSIONER FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH-16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. V, S/O NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYAT WING) KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHAILIPATNAM 4. SRI A VENKATESWARARAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PRI), BUNDAR ROAD, OPP. PWD GROUNDS, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK CHANDU SAHEB, S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MANGOLU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, MANGOLU VILLAGE, VATSAVAI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI K SUBBA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-BALUSUPADU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, BALUSUPADU VILLAGE, JAGAIAHPETA MANDAL AND 2 TAKKALLAPADU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, TAKKALLAPADU VILLAGE, JAGAIAHPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V.N.V.SURYA DATTU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI 2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.77 of 2022 ORDER: This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 07.10.2021 in W.P.No.21069 of 2021. 2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required. 3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 05.12.2025 SCS 4 81 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.77 of 2022 Dt.05.12.2025 SCS