Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39891 (RAJ)

JITENDRA GUPTA S/O CHANDRAMA GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15904/2024 · 2025-10-08

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41496] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15904/2024 1. Jitendra Gupta S/o Chandrama Gupta, Aged About 46 Years, R/o J.d.e. Colony, Govindpura, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Ram Bhajan Meena S/o Shri Hajari Lal Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 13, Jagganath Puri, Triveni Nagar-I, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Shailendra Singh Rajawat S/o Shri Raghuveer Singh Rajawat, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kherla Khurd, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. Vishnu Banjara S/o Shri Charan Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 25524, Meethi Kothi, Banjara Basti, Darjiyon Ka Rasta, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Sonu Kumar S/o Shri Amar Chand, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Plot No. 10, Friends Colony, Sirsi Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Amar Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Chanwar Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 18/g/19 Saraswati Apartment, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajashtan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Housing Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Commissioner, Ram Kishor Vyas Bhawan, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur- 302004. 3. The Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishor Vyas Bhawan, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur- 302004 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpit Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Meel HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “i) by way of appropriate writ, order or directions the respondents may kindly be [2025:RJ-JP:41496] (2 of 3) [CW-15904/2024] directed to regularize the services of the humble petitioners with effect from the date of their initial engagement; ii) by way of appropriate writ, order or directions all such benefits of regularization and regular pay scale may be granted to the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment; iii) by way of appropriate writ, order or directions the respondents may kindly be directed to grant minimum of the regular pay scale of the Civilian Guards/Class-IV employee to the petitioners till regularization; iv) by way of appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the role of the placement agency which is unnecessarily being a middle man in engagement of the petitioners and further the respondents may be directed not to engage any new placement agency or not to issue any notice inviting bids; v) any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioners; vi) cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioners..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that recently in case of Dharam Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. 2025 INSC 998, Hon’ble Supreme Court has considered case of identically placed workers, engaged for long duration and directed regularization, even after creating supernumerary posts, accordingly the petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:41496] (3 of 3) [CW-15904/2024] may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve their grievances on basis of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation on basis of legal position, referred by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /84