$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CMI 7/2025 MADHU TAYAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja Saini, Advocate versus SHRI GHANSHYAM DAS TAYAL .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: MS. PANNA DUTTA, REGISTRAR O R D E R % 29.05.2025 1. Affidavit of undertaking has been filed by the appellant stating therein that she will vacate the property by 31.08.2025. However, the address of the suit property is mentioned as Plot No.30, Block No.75 whereas actually it is Plot No.75 and Block No.30, as mentioned in the Order dated 20.05.2025. The complete address is otherwise correctly mentioned in the undertaking. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that it is a typographical error. REGISTRAR MAY 29, 2025 vk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:40:10