1 2025:CGHC:41380 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9619 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sarashwati Baraik Wife Deonarayan Baraik Aged About 47 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Middle Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Sarguja, District- Sarguja Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Jashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Block Jashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For State-Respondents : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 18-08-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of with Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 liberty to move fresh representation and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07-07-2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07-07-2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07-2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil