Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39876 (KAR)

M/S J P ENTERPRISES v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/26204/2022 · 2025-10-14

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40695 WP No. 26204 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.26204 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S J.P. ENTERPRISES NO.14/5, I FLOOR, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GANESHA BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. REP. BY MR. JINESH D. 2. M/S. JINESH ASSOCIATES REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. JINESH D. NO.14/5, I FLOOR, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GANESHA BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. 3. MR. JINESH D. S/O LATE DHARANENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.14/5, I FLOOR, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GANESHA BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK, ARM BRANCH-II, IFSC - CNRB0001985, 2ND FLOOR, CIRCLE OFFICE, SPENCER TOWERS, NO.86, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40695 WP No. 26204 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, RAYING TO DIRECT TO THE RESPONDENT-BANK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 17TH JUNE, 2022 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation for petitioners. 2. This petition is of the year-2022 and listed for seventh time for non-compliance of office objections. 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for petitioners failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioners would indicate that the petitioners have no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9