.APHC011465772013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0;^ TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 184 OF 2025 Appeal filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, against the Judgment and Decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - cum - III Additional District and Sessions Judge Tirupathi in M.V.O.P No.493/2010 dated 12-01-2012. Between: Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited., Represented by its Managing Director, Villupuram, Tamilnadu. ...Respondent/Appellant AND N Munemma, W/o Late N.Ramanaiah, Hindu, aged about 30 years. Minor N Kalpana, D/o late N.Ramanaiah, Hindu, aged about 11 years, Minor N Lavanya, D/o Late N.Ramanaiah, Hindu, aged about 8 years 2 & 3 are rep. by their next friend, guardian And Mother 1 N.Munemma N Nagamma, W/o N.Merumaiaiah, Hindu, aged about 50 years N Merumaiaiah, S/o Late Ankawar, Hindu, aged about 55 years (All are R/o of Yanadi Colony, Ramanujapalli panchayat, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District) 1. 2. 3. St Petitioner 4. 5. ...Claimants/Respondents lA NO: 2 OF 2013fMACMAMP 1210 OF 2013 z> Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of execution of the award and decree passed in MVOP No.493/2010 dated 12.01.2012 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - - Ill Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiurpati pending the Condoantion of dealy petition. cum Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G V Jayasimha (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following order: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS M.A.C.M.A.No.184 of 2025 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed against the order, dated 12.01.2012 in M.V.O.P.No.493 of 2010 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-lll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati. On 03.04.2025, 17.04.2025 and 17.06.2025, there was no 2. representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It 3. appears that the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal. 4. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ny SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - District and Sessions Judge Tirupathi, Chittoor District, (with records) 2. One CC to Sri G V Jayasimha Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati. 4. Two CD Copies cum - III Additional at SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 JUDGMENT MACMA No. 184 of 2025 ^ 2 2 JUL 2025 jg ysgjinynt Sectioa^^y x> DISMISSING THE MACMA FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS