BABULAL S/O LATE SHRI PRABHU B/C KHATIK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5769/2019 · 2025-10-07
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39873 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39873 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40637] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.5769/2019
1. Babulal S/o Late Shri Prabhu, aged about 52 Years, R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Pragpura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Mahendra S/o Late Shri Prabhu, aged about 42 Years, R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Pragpura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. Kailash Vasisth S/o Shri Vishwanath Sharma, R/o Gram Lalana, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deen Dayal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Vikram Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/10/2025
1. The instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.49/2019 registered at Police Station-Pragpura, District-Jaipur (Rural), Jaipur.
2. Vide order dated 01.07.2024, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court directed the learned Public Prosecutor to procure the latest factual report in this matter. Today, learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the latest factual report prepared by the S.H.O., Police Station-Pragpura, District-Jaipur (Rural), Jaipur, which reveals that after investigation no offence was found against the petitioners. Hence, the police authorities have submitted a negative final
[2025:RJ-JP:40637] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5769/2019] report against the petitioners on 30.12.2019 which has been accepted by the concerning Court on 22.12.2020.
3. Factual Report dated 14.07.2024 is taken on record.
4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition at this stage.
5. Hence, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of on account of being not pressed by the petitioners.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/58