1 2025:CGHC:7935-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1794 of 2022 1 - Rajesh Sundrani S/o Late Kishore Sundrani, Aged About 35 Years, Occupation Shopkeeper, R/o Mohan Medical Stores, Nai Basti, Hanuman Ganj, Katni (M.P.) 2 - Rahul Sundrani S/o Late Kishore Sundrani, Aged About 31 Years, Occupation Nil, R/o Mohan Medical Stores, Nai Basti, Hanuman Ganj, Katni (M.P.) 3 - Smt. Asha Sundrani W/o Late Kishore Sundrani, Aged About 61 Years, Occupation Nil, R/o Mohan Medical Stores, Nai Basti, Hanuman Ganj, Katni (M.P.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through the Station House Officer, Police Station Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Tanya Sundrani D/o Sanjay Hirani, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sindhi Colony, Ward No. 4, Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Rudra Pratap Dubey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.2 Mr. Abhijeet Sarkar, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 14-02-2025 Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 1. Heard Mr. Rudra Pratap Dubey, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State and Mr. Abhijeet Sarkar, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with the following prayer:- “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash impugned FIR bearing Crime No. 518/2022 registered at Police Station, Bemetara, District-Bemetara (C.G.) against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 323, 34, 498-A of IPC, in the interest of justice accordingly.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present matter the trial is at advanced stage and the prosecution evidence is to be closed shortly, hence, he does not want to press this petition further. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil