APHC010497732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 25740/2025 Between: 1. CHANDAKA MAHA LAKSHMI, W/O. APPALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT -- YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. PARAJAPADU VILLAGE, JIYYAMMAVALASA MANDAL, PALAKONDA DIVISION, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT PARVATIPURAM. 3. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, PARVATHIPURAM. 4. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDA, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. 5. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, JIYYAMMAVALASA MANDAL, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering R.C.No.235/2024/S.S./ Dt.29.11.2024, signed on 04.01.2025 to log open the web land in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.0.30cts in Sy.No.153-8B and Ac.0.44cts in Sy.No.183-18A the recommendation of the Tahsildar R.C.No.235/2024/S.S./Dt.31.11.2024 in 6 petitioners land of Parijapadu Village, Jiyyammavalasa Mandal, Parvatipuram Manyam District as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of A.P. Rights In Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and also violative of Articles 14,16,21 300A of the Constitution Of India and consequently direct the respondents to mutate the name of the petitioner in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.O.SOcts in Sy.No.153-8B and Ac.0.44cts in Sy.No.183-18A petitioners land of Parijapadu Village, Jiyyammavalasa Mandal, Parvatipuram Manyam District into the online web land records and issue pattadar passbooks and title deeds to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the recommendation of the 5th respondent in proceedings No.R.C.No.235/2024/S.S./Dt.29.11.2024, R.C.No.235/2024/S.S/ Dt.31.11.2024 signed on 04.01.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UDAY KUMAR VAMPUGADAVALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering R.C.No.235/2024/S.S./ Dt.29.11.2024, signed on 04.01.2025 to log open the web land in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.0.30cts in Sy.No.153-8B and Ac.0.44cts in Sy.No.183-18A the recommendation of the Tahsildar R.C.No.235/2024/S.S./ Dt.31.11.2024 in 6 petitioners land of Parijapadu Village, Jiyyammavalasa Mandal, Parvatipuram Manyam District as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of A.P. Rights In Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and also violative of Articles 14,16,21 300A of the Constitution Of India and consequently direct the respondents to mutate the name of the petitioner in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.0.30cts in Sy.No.153-8B and Ac.0.44cts in Sy.No.183-18A petitioners land of Parijapadu Village, Jiyyammavalasa Mandal, Parvatipuram Manyam District into the online web land records and issue pattadar passbooks and title deeds to the petitioner and to pass or orders….” 2. Heard Sri V.Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application for mutation of her name in the revenue records and web adangal. The said application has been considered and an endorsement has been given on 29.11.2024 and subsequently the petitioner has submitted one more application and the said application has been forwarded to respondent no.3 by respondent no.4 on 31.11.2024 on the ground as the said survey number is not 4 sub-divided and accordingly the web adangal option is only with the Joint Collector. Accordingly, he recommended the same, vide letter dated 31.11.2024. Despite the said report and recommendation, respondent no.3 has not considered and passed any order. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the record, respondent no.3 may consider the report and recommendations made by respondent no.4 and pass appropriate orders as per the records, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 19.11.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.25740 of 2025 19.11.2025 RD