Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39870 (JHR)

NIKHIL KISHORE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3436/2025 · 2025-12-19

Sanjay Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:38375 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 3436 of 2025 …. Nikhil Kishore, Aged about 37 years, son of Dr. Kishore Kumar Sinha, Resident of Satakshi, C114, Sector C, Ashokapuri near passport office, Khajpura, P.O. B.V.College, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna (Bihar). At present Resident of 2904, Mayfair the view, Vikhroli, P.O.. & P.S. Vikhroli, District- Suburban, Mumbai., State-Maharashtra …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2 Monika, wife of Nikhil Kishore, Daughter of Umesh Kumar Sinha. 3. Amaira Kashyap Aged about 6 years, Daughter of Nikhil Kishore represented through her mother Monika. Sl. No.2 and 3 both Resident of Rose Berry 5051. Sahara Garden City, Adityapur, P.O. R.I.T. Jamshedpur, P.S. R.I.T Adityapur, Distrtict-Saraikella BIT, Mesra Kharsawan (Pin-831014). At present Resident of Triveni-22, Vastu Vihar, BIT Mesra Road, P.O. BIT Mesra, PS-BIT More, District-Ranchi (Pin- 835215) .…… Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the petitioner : Mrs. Neeta Krishna, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A. P. P. ….. 02/19.12.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The instant Cr. M. P. No. 3436 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Criminal Revision No. 642 of 2025, which stood dismissed on 31.07.2025 due to non-compliance of the order dated 17.07.2025 passed by this Court. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to inadvertence, the order dated 17.07.2025 passed by this Court could not be complied with. It is submitted that the petitioner will remain vigilant in future and hence, Cr. M. P. No. 3436 of 2025 may be allowed and Criminal Revision No. 642 of 2025 may be restored to its original file. 2025:JHHC:38375 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the averment made in para-5, 6 and 7 of the instant petition, the present Cr. M. P. No. 3436 of 2025 is allowed. Criminal Revision No. 642 of 2025 is restored to its original file. 6. Office to list this case as per roster. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 19.12.2025 Kamlesh/