MAMTA AMOLI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEHRADUN
WPMS/3228/2016 · 2025-05-13
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3987 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3987 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:3846 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/3228/2016
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
None appears for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Lakhera, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Sandeep Kothari,
learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
2. This matter was earlier listed on 27.11.2019 and since then the matter was never been listed. Even on perusal of the order sheet there is no interim
order in favour of the petitioner.
3. Mr. Sandeep Kothari,
learned counsel for the respondent submits that it appears from the relief, as sought in this petition, due to efflux of time the same has now rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
13.05.2025 Parul
2025:UHC:3846