Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040020362025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/581/2025 M/s Hills Trading Company represented by its proprietor Smti Yatung Byaling, Wife of Shri Tanga Byaling, permanent resident of Byaling Building, Golden Market Daporijo, PO and PS Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Kim Paka Colony Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Union of India and 5 Ors represented by the Inspector General, North East Frontier HQ, ITB Police MHA, Govt of India, Khatting Hill Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 7911112:The Deputy Inspector General Age: 0 Occupation : SHQ Likabali ITBP Force MHA/ Govt of India Upper Colony Likabali Lower Siang District 791125 3:The Second in Commandant (Engr) Age: 0 Occupation : Likabali ITBP PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Deputy Commandant (Engr) Age: 0 Occupation : NE FTR ITB Police Page No.# 2/3 Itanagar. 5:The Commandant Age: 0 Occupation : 10th Bn ITBP Kimin Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Assistant Commandant (Engr) Age: 0 Occupation : 10th Bn ITB Police Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Wanglat Khomrang,Tadar Bai,E S NIDO MARI,Biri Esther,Nannu Yubi,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, DSGI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 16.09.2026 Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the work pursuant to the impugned NIT dated 15.11.2025 for construction of OR’s accommodation (02 Nos of Jawan Barak) at Maja BOP of 10th Battalion, Kimin (Balance work) has already been completed, however, he prays that he may be allowed to avail the appropriate remedies in accordance with law. Mr. M. Kato, learned Dy.SGI for the respondents is present. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous Needless to observe that the petitioner may avail the appropriate remedies for payment of dues, if any, payable to the petitioner as may be permissible under the law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.16 15:13:46 +05'30'