Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39866 (KAR)

SRI SACHIN NAGARAJAPPA v. SRI N JAYARAM IAS

CCC/383/2024 · 2025-08-21

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32912-DB CCC No. 383 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 383 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. SACHIN NAGARAJAPPA, S/O DR. A.H. NAGARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, No.95, I BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU - 560072. REPRESENTED BY HIS PA HOLDER, DR. A.H. NAGARAJAPPA, S/O LATE AREHALLI HALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, No.95, I BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU - 560072. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR R., ADVOCATE -(ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. N. JAYARAM, IAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, SANKEY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 020. Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32912-DB CCC No. 383 of 2024 2. DR. A. LOKESHA, KSAS FINANCE MEMBER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST SANKEY ROAD BENGALURU-560 020. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. MURUGESH V CHARATI, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYS TO (i) PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED 21.06.2022 IN W.P.No.11179/2020 PASSED BY LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ETC. THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32912-DB CCC No. 383 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objection, the same has not been complied with. 2. Today, the matter is listed for compliance of office objection for the third time. There is no representation for the complainant, even for the second call. 3. Hence, the contempt of court case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 24