MANOHAR VATARKAR S/O SH. GAJANAN RAO v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2218/2025 · 2025-11-06
Sameer Jain
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39864 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39864 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44442] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2218/2025
1. Manohar Vatarkar S/o Sh. Gajanan Rao, Aged About 60 Years, R/o C-139, Abhilasha Colony, Devas Road, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.
2. Smt. Kapila W/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar, Aged About 55 Years, R/o C-139, Abhilasha Colony, Devas Road, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.
3. Sradha Vatarkar D/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar W/o Hitesh Pootnees, Aged About 29 Years, R/o C-139, Abhilasha Colony, Devas Road, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Palash Gupta for Ms. Sonia Shandilya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 06/11/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 10/2025 registered at Police Station Railway Colony District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 380 IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that vide order dated 11.03.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicants subject to the condition that applicants join investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicants joined investigation (undertaken by learned counsel for the applicants).
3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
[2025:RJ-JP:44442] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2218/2025]
4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicants have already joined investigation as directed vide interim order dated 11.03.2025; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 11.03.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Railway Colony District Kota City in FIR No. 10/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants 1. Manohar Vatarkar S/o Sh. Gajanan Rao, 2. Smt. Kapila W/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar and
3. Sradha Vatarkar D/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar W/o Hitesh Pootnees shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade themselves from disclosing such
facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /264