APHC010077092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 459/2025 Between: 1. GAJJALA NARAYANAMMA,, . W/O NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 2. PENCHALREDDYGARI CHINNA NARASA REDDY,, S/O PENCHAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. 3. GAJJALA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O NARASIMHAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 4. PENCHALREDDYGARI CHINNAPA REDDY,, S/O PENCHAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 5. PENCHALREDDYGARI PEDDA NARASA REDDY,, S/O SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. 6. GUNDLURU NAGAIAH,, S/O MUNEYYA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 7. MALINENIPATNAM GANGAMMA,, W/O SHESHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. 8. DUNNUTALA SUDHAKARA REDDY,, S/O RAMI REDDY. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 9. VALLUM PERAIAH,, S/O BALASIDHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 10. PIDUGU RAMA SUBBAMMA,, W/O KONDALARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 11. PATUM RAMULAMMA,, W/O RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. ALL ARE R/O MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR 2 MANDAL,KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI G SRINIVASULU IAS, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GALERU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTI PROJECT NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI A VENKATESU, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION,UNIT-LL,TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 05.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.5739 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Lordships, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 25.04.2025 passed in C.C.No.459 of 2025 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 25.04.2025 passed in C.C.No.459 of 2025 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit to implead the proposed Respondent as Respondent No.3 in Contempt Case C.C.No. 459 of 2025, and also pending miscellaneous petitions therein on the file of this Hon'ble High Court, and pass 3 IA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to discharge the Respondent No.1 from the Contempt Case No.459 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.459 of 2025 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 05.03.2024, disposed of the W.P.No.5739 of 2024, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein to examine the representation dated 09.09.2022 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, and communicate the same to the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. For non-compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed. 2. Precisely, representation is submitted for payment of Solatium on the enhanced compensation and interest amount on the Additional Market Value. 3. The 2nd respondent-Special Deputy Collector (LA) (FAC), TGP Unit-II, Kadapa, vide proceedings dated 01.03.2025, disposed of the representation by relying on orders passed in W.P.Nos.23443 and 23447 of 2010, and suggested the petitioners to file Execution Petition before the competent civil Court. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners requested that a similar order be passed as in C.C.No.451 of 2025, wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court, while closing the contempt case, granted liberty to the petitioners therein to file an Execution Petition before the competent civil Court. 5. The Hon’ble Apex Court in R.N.Dey and others v. Bhagyabati Pramanik and others 1 held that proper forum to execute the award is competent civil Court. 1 (2000) 4 SCC 400 5 6. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to petitioners to approach competent Civil Court for execution of the award. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025 KBN 6 120 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.459 of 2025 02.12.2025 KKBBNN