[2025:JHHC:35317] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6678 of 2025 1. Numan Ansari, aged about 31 years, son of Sahadut Ansari, resident of Village Murpa, P.O. and P.S. Balumath, District Latehar (Jharkhand). 2. Mohsin Kamal @ Mohshin Kamal, aged about 31 years, son of Suleman @Md. Suleman, resident of Village Harli, P.O. and P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh, at present resident of Azad Nagar, Palawal, P.O. and P.S. Katkamsandi, District Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). 3. Aftab Ansari, aged about 27 years, son of Abdul Rauf, resident of Village Bargaun, P.O. and P.S. Tandwa, District Chatra (Jharkhand). ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sahil, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, A.P.P. ------ 04/ 26.11.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with CID P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 54 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned A.J.C.-XVIII, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that allegation is made against the petitioner for taking job on forged and fabricated documents. He further submits that the land in question was acquired by the CCL in the Piparwar colliery and the said land was verified by the Circle Officer, Tandwa and he has certified that the said [2025:JHHC:35317] -2- land belongs to the ancestor of the petitioner and, thereafter, the petitioner has been appointed. He then submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case alleging that on the forged and fabricated documents, the job has been obtained. He next submits that in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused person has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 6582 of 2025 by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of taking job on the forged and fabricated documents. 5. Page 38 is the report of the Circle Officer, Tandwa wherefrom it transpires that the said land is of the ancestor of the petitioners and the name of ancestor is mentioned as Lakshan Miyan at Serial No. 4 in the said report and in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused person has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 6582 of 2025 by this court, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.J.C.-XVIII, Ranchi, in connection with CID P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 54 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-26.11.2025 Amitesh/-