Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39858 (MAD)

J.MOHAN KUMAR v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR

WP/11353/2025 · 2025-04-01

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.11353 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.11353 of 2025 J.Mohan Kumar .... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Registrar Chennai Central Chennai. 2.The Sub Registrar Adyar Sub Registrar Office Adyar, Chennai. 3.The Inspector of Police J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090. 4.A.Mohammed Nazar .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent and second respondent to cancel the Partnership Deed and General Power of Attorney which was in favour of the fourth respondent herein and to direct the third respondent to take necessary action against the fourth respondent herein and to 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11353 of 2025 pass an order based on the representation dated 25.01.2024, by considering the petitioner's representation within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Naresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Harish Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate for R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondent to cancel the partnership deed and general Power of Attorney presented by the fourth respondent, by considering the representation made by the petitioner on 25.01.2024. 2. Heard Mr. R.Naresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2, and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate for third respondent. 3. In the considered view of this Court, the first and second respondent are 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11353 of 2025 not vested with any power to cancel the documents. That apart, there is absolutely no indication in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition as to when such partnership deed was presented for registration and when the Power of Attorney was presented for registration. Therefore, the entire relief sought in this writ petition is vague without sufficient particulars. 4. In view of the above, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No costs. 01.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral citation : Yes/No ds To: 1.The District Registrar Chennai Central Chennai. 2.The Sub Registrar Adyar Sub Registrar Office Adyar, Chennai. 3.The Inspector of Police J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11353 of 2025 Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11353 of 2025 N. ANAND VENKATESH., J ds W.P.No.11353 of 2025 01.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis