Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39852 (RAJ)

PRERNA PATIDAR D/O POONAM CHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14710/2025 · 2025-10-13

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41769] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14710/2025 Prerna Patidar D/o Poonam Chand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Motipura, Post Samrai, Tehsil Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 2266503) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Headquarter, Jalore. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jalore. 5. Chandra Prakash Nagar S/o Seeta Ram Nagar, Through Director Elementary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner while referring order dated 08.10.2025 in SBCWP No.14724/2025 Chandra Shekhar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that during the recruitment process, petitioner has secured 191.5264 marks in OBC-non creamy layer category and while filing his preference in counseling and petitioner preferred Jhalawar as her first district for posting, for Teacher Gr.III Level 2 Science-Math. [2025:RJ-JP:41769] (2 of 3) [CW-14710/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that allotment list dated 14.08.2025 was issued by the Office of Director of Primary Education, Rajasthan for granting first posting to the candidates selected through RPSC, RSSB or any other recruiting agency and as per the aforesaid circular, place of posting shall be assigned as per merit cum preference. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the persons lower in merit than the petitioner have although been assigned their home district, yet the petitioner despite giving her first preference, the same has not been considered and the petitioner has been posted at Jalore. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that similar controversy was considered by this Hon’ble Court in the case of Kindar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6507/2017) decided on 04.08.2021. Thereafter considered and relied in order dated 28.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12876/2025 Omprakash Gurjar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 5. In the light of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with directions to the petitioner to make a representation in the light of circular dated 18.05.2020 issued by the Administrative Reform Department and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court in case of Kindar Vs State of Rajasthan (supra). In case, the respondents find that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid circular and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court, then appropriate order for modifying her place of posting may be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of submitting a representation along [2025:RJ-JP:41769] (3 of 3) [CW-14710/2025] with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 6. Instant civil writ petition with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/20