APHC011360032014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAfei AT AMARAVATI 7* Xr m '■f' U f-\ A: WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL fFCA) NO: 46 OF 2024 Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the Order and Decree, dated 14-09-2014 passed in O.P.No.271 of 2012, on the file of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Between: Vakkalanka Subrahmanya Kameswara Sarma, S/o.Late Manikayala Rao, aged 45 years. Working as Manager, Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, R/o.207-C, Visakhapatnam. Sector-9, Ukkunagaram, ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT AND 1. Master Vakkalanka Phani Surya Manikyala Rao @ S/o.Venkata Subrahmanya Kameswara Sarma, Phanisai, aged 10 years, presently residing with his mother, Smt.Vakkalanka Radha Lalitha, W/o.Sri Vakkalanka Subrahmanya Kameswara Sarma, aged 36 years. House wife, presently residing with her father M.Venkata Durga Prasad, D.No.9-10-13, Gautami Nagar, Kovvur, West Godavari District. 2. Smt Vakkalanka Radha Lalitha, W/o.Sh Vakkalanka Subrahmanya Kameswara Sarma, aged 36 years. House wife, presently residing with her father M.Venkata Durga Prasad, D.No.9-10-13, Gautami Nagar, Kovvur, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS I lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Judgment and decree in O.P.No.271 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above FCA. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI V.RAMANJANEYULU, ADVOCATE REPRESENTING SRI E.V.V.S. RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M.S.R.SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following JUDGMENT : APHC011360032014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 46/2024 [3526] Between: 1.VAKKALANKA SUBRAHMANYA KAMESWARA SARMA,, S/0 LATE MANIKAYALA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, R/0 207-C, SECTOR-9 UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD. ...APPELLANT AND 1.MASTER VAKKALANKA PHANI SURYA MANIKYALA RAO PHANISAI, S/0 VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA KAMESWARA SARMA, AGED 10 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING WITH HIS MOTHER, SMT.VAKKALANKA RADHA LALITHA, W/0 SRI VAKKALANKA SUBRAHMANYA KAMESWARA SARMA, AGED 36 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE. PRESENTLY RESIDING WITH HER FATHER M.VENKATA DURGA PRASAD, D.NO. 9-10-13, GAUTAMI NAGAR, KOVVUR, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 2.SMT VAKKALANKA RADHA LALITHA, W/0 SRI VAKKALANKA SUBRAHMANYA KAMESWARA SARMA, AGED 36 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE. PRESENTLY RESIDING WITH HER FATHER M.VENKATA DURGA PRASAD, D.NO. 9-10-13, GAUTAMI NAGAR, KOVVUR, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section against orders appellant begs to present this Memorandum of Family Court Appeal against the decree and Order in O.P. No. 271 of 2012, dated 14th September, 2014 on the of the Court of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam, 2 lA NO: 1 OF 2015(FCAMP 109 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 28 days in filing the above FCA and pass lA NO: 4 OF 2015(FCAMP 3405 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lA NO: 6 OF 2015(FCAMP 3407 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of judgment and decree in O.P.No.271 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above FCA and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1.E VVS RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.M S R SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. V.Ramanjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the appellant is not intending to pursue the appeal and hence prays to dismiss the Appeal. 3 In view of the same, the F.C.A. stands dismissed. No costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal, shall stand closed. SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR fi 5 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri M.S.R.Subrahmanyam, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi ^ 5. Two CD Copies BSV TAC HIGH COURT DATED;02/07/2025 JUDGMENT FCA NO. 46 OF 2024 DISMISSING THE FCA WITHOUT COSTS