1 2025:CGHC:44492 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8520 of 2023 1 - Pitamber Sidar S/o Sudhram Sidar Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi), Posted At Government College, Sakti, District : Sakti, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Upper Secretary C.G. State Higher Education, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Secretary C.G. State, General Administration Department, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Principal Secretary C.G. State, Home And Forest Department And Chairman Of Committee Of Senior Secretaries 5 - Secretary C.G. State, Transport Department And Member Of Committee Of Senior Secretaries Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - Secretary C.G. State, General Administration Department And Member Of Committee Of Senior Secretaries. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Pathak, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate . For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/09/2025 1. This petition is preferred against orders dated 2.1.2023, 8.8.2023 and 6.10.2023. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and quash the orders passed by the respondents (ANNEXURE P/1, P/2, AND P/3) and also direct the respondent to decide the representation dated 05.01.2023 submitted by the petitioner according to the transfer policy, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief, which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.." 3 3. Vide order dated 19.10.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, have lost its efficacy and as such the orders dated 2.1.2023, 8.8.2023 and 6.10.2023 are required to be quashed and accordingly the said orders under challenge are hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat