CHANDRA SHEKHAR S/O RAJENDRA SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14724/2025 · 2025-10-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39837 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39837 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14724/2025 Chandra Shekhar S/o Rajendra Singh, aged about 32 years, R/o Charno Ka Bas, Randari, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali, Rajasthan. (Roll No.4219564) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education) Headquarter, Sirohi.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sirohi.
5. Kailash Kumar S/o Mohal Lal, through Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. (Roll No.4221026) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 08/10/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the recruitment process, petitioner has secured 249.4646 marks in OBC category and while filing his preference in counseling, petitioner preferred Jaipur as his first district for posting, for Teacher Gr.III Level 2 Hindi.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that allotment list dated 31.05.2025. was issued by the Office of Director of Primary Education, Rajasthan for granting first posting
(2 of 3) [CW-14724/2025] to the candidates selected through RPSC, RSSB or any other recruiting agency and as per the aforesaid circular, place of posting shall be assigned as per merit cum preference.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the persons lower in merit than the petitioner have although been assigned their home district, yet the petitioner despite giving his first preference, the same has not been considered and the petitioner has been posted at Sirohi.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that similar controversy was considered by this Hon’ble Court in the case of Kindar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6507/2017) decided on 04.08.2021. Thereafter considered and relied by order dated 28.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12876/2025 Omprakash Gurjar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
5. In the light of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with directions to the petitioner to make a representation in the light of circular dated 18.05.2020 issued by the Administrative Reform Department and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court in case of Kindar Vs State of Rajasthan (supra). In case, the respondents find that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid circular and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court, then appropriate order for modifying his place of posting may be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of submitting a representation along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
(3 of 3) [CW-14724/2025]
6. Instant civil writ petition with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /21