Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39831 (MAD)

R.SURESH v. THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REBY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNENT

WP/11226/2025 · 2025-06-19

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.11226 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.06.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP No.11226 of 2025 R.Suresh S/o. Rajabathar, No. 11/7 Reddy Street, Villivakam, Chennai - 600 049. Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry Dairying Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare Department, Fort St George, Chennai. 2. The Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner, Greater of Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.11226 of 2025 4. The District Collector Ma Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001 Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents to develop and construct cattle stable across the Chennai City, one in each zone with the amenities for grazing and fodder storage to preserve and protect the living and health conditions of the cattle by regulating the cattle owners with a license permitting to use and maintain the cattle stables under the supervision of the 3rd respondent in view of the petitioner's representation dated 06.08.2024. For Petitioner: Mrs.Karthikaa Ashok For Respondents: Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 Mr.A.Arun Babu Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Mr.Arun Babu appearing for third respondent states that the petition itself will be considered as a representation. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.11226 of 2025 2. Mr.Arun Babu further states that within one week he shall send an email to Ms.Ashok indicating the time and date on which petitioner and Ms.Ashok can meet respondent No.3/Commissioner to suggest how the expectations of petitioner can be implemented. 3. The Commissioner may take a decision in accordance with law and if it is feasible. We express no opinion. Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 19.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.11226 of 2025 To: 1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamilnadu, Animal Husbandry Dairying Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare Department, Fort St George, Chennai. 2. The Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 3. The Commissioner, Greater of Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai 4. The District Collector Ma Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.11226 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (sasi) WP No.11226 of 2025 19.06.2025 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis