IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3528] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 532/2025 Between: 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HYDERABAD. ...APELLANT AND 1.Boya Guvvala Govind, aged 50 years, S/o Chinna Sanjanna, Pullagummi villae, Veldurthy Mandal. (A4) 2.Boya Motor Laxmanna, 28 years, S/o Chinna Sanjanna, Pullagummi village, Veldurthy Mandal.(A5) 3.Boya Chinna Sunkanna @ Nattalanna @ Mottenna, 35 years, S/o Gokaram, Pullagummi village. (A6) 4.Rathnapalli Ramana Reddy @ Boyina Venkata Ramana Reddy, 45 years, S/o Seetha Rami Reddy, N/o Ratnapalli village, Veldurthy Mandal, Now at H.No.9-11, A.Krishna Nagar, Kurnool. (A7) 5.Kasireddy Nagarjuna Reddy, 19 years, S/o Sankarananda Reddy, Pullagummi village, Veldurthy Mandal, now residing in H.No.51-15- 3D, Rajeev Nagar, Bellary Road. (A8) 6.Jakkam Chandra Reddy @ Chandra, 24 years, S/o J.Somasunder Reddy, N/o Markapur village, Kallur Mandal, Now residing inH.No.81- 248, Kasturinagar, Kurnool. (A9) 7.Goda Chinna Laxmanna Yadav, 34 years, S/o G.C.Tirupathaiah, Pullagummi village, Veldurty Mandal, Kurnool District. (A10) 8.Boya Manohar @ Mani, 23 years, S/o Madhava Swamy, of Pullagummi village. (A11) ...RESPOND ENTS Counsel for the Appellant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.S.S.NAGESWARA REDDY SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2 Crl.A No.532 of 2025 The Court made the following JUDGMENT :- (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Suresh Reddy) Questioning the judgment of acquittal, dated 28.04.2011 passed by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool, in S.C.No.348 of 2008, against A.4 to A.11, the State has filed the present appeal under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr.P.C. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the respondents/accused submitted that by virtue of the said Judgment, the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool convicted A.1 to A.3, who filed Criminal Appeal No.611 of 2011 before the combined High Court. He further submits that questioning the acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, in so far as A.4 to A.11 are concerned, the defacto complainant filed Criminal Appeal No.659 of 2011. After hearing both sides, the combined High Court allowed Criminal Appeal No.611 of 2011 by judgment, dated 21.02.2018 and Criminal Appeal No.659 of 2011 was dismissed by the combined High Court by Judgment, dated 21.02.2018. 3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor also confirms the said fact. 4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal filed by the defacto complainant vide Crl.A.No.659 of 2011, nothing survives in the present Criminal Appeal. 5. Accordingly, while recording the above submissions, the present Criminal Appeal is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dt. 21.07.2025 SAB / TSNR 3 Crl.A No.532 of 2025 27 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Criminal Appeal No.532 of 2025 (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Suresh Reddy) Dt. 21.07.2025 SAB / TSNR