[2025:RJ-JP:40263] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9660/2025 Anil Sharma S/o Ghanshyam Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Taleda, Sobri Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Confined In District Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/10/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Anil Sharma S/o Ghanshyam Sharma, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.42/2024 dated 28.01.2024 registered at P.S. Christian Ganj District - Ajmer, for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 419 and 120-B of IPC . 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:40263] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9660/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per police investigation, a company was established by Sanwar Singh but he used the documents of present petitioner. He further submits that the entire operation of company was managed by Sanwar Singh and not by the present petitioner and he also submits that even the present petitioner is not aware about the affairs of company established by Sanwar Singh. He further submitted that other accused were already granted bail and alleged offence are triable by Magistrate First Class. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 28.01.2024, complainant Ram Swaroop, SI, P.S. Christian Ganj District – Ajmer, on a tip has reached 4th floor of Miraj Mall, Ajmer and conducted a raid on Fin Corp Tree Company engaged in providing cheap loans to consumers. On search, he found that company is owned by Sanwar Singh Rawat and managed by Udit Chatterjee as Manager. The modus operandi is to place a call through call assistance and pursue consumers for cheap loan and collect processing fee and thereby committing a cheat with them. After [2025:RJ-JP:40263] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9660/2025] registration of case, police has recorded statement of victims duped by the company in the name of providing cheap loans after collecting process fee. A copy of these statements is placed on record. 7. During investigation, police has found that Fin Tree Business Solution India is legally owned by the present petitioner and in his bank account, there was a transaction of ₹ 1,65,00,000/-. Police has found involvement of Sanwar Singh in similar type of criminal activities. After investigation, police has already filed a charge-sheet against Yuvraj Singh, Aashish Saini, Udit Chatterjee, Piyush, Anil Sharma under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 120-B of IPC. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner accused who is in custody since 16.07.2025. The material on record clearly indicate that whatever be the reason, the present petitioner is a legal owner of the firm which committed cheating with large number of people. 8. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail. 9. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. [2025:RJ-JP:40263] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9660/2025] 10. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by the applicant-accused Anil Sharma S/o Ghanshyam Sharma, is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/20