1 2025:CGHC:13969 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 773 of 2019 1 - Khageshwar S/o Lalit Aghariya Aged About 39 Years 2 - Trilochan S/o Shankar Aghariya Aged About 27 Years 3 - Sumant S/o Gokul Aghariya Aged About 30 Years 4 - Lochan S/o Gokul Aghariya Aged About 29 Years 5 - Sushila D/o Lalit Aghariya, Aged About 44 Years 6 - Shakuntala D/o Lalit Aghariya Aged About 42 Years 7 - Santoshi D/o Lalit Aghariya Aged About 37 Years 8 - Rajwanti D/o Gokul Aghariya Aged About 32 Years All are by Caste Aghariya, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Khamhariya, P.S. And Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - Lalit S/o Haricharan Aghariya Aged About 62 Years 2 - Ramshankar S/o Haricharan Aghariya Aged About 58 Years 3 - Gokul S/o Haricharan Aghariya Aged About 50 Years PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.03.25 11:03:30 +0530 2 All are R/o Village Khamhariya, P.S. And Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Jayaswal Neco Limited Registered Office F-8, S.I.D.C. Industrial Area, Hingna Road Nagpur (Maharashtra) 5 - Ambuja Cement Limited, Gare Pelma 4/8 Coal Mince, 2nd Floor, Aditya Business Park, In Front Of Modi Complex, Dhimrapur Chowk Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Vinod Kumar Deshmukh, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rohishek Verma and Mr. Ashutosh Shrivastava For State : Ms. Neeta T. Thawani, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 24/03/2025 1. WP227 No.773/2019 be de-linked from WP227 No.975/2019. 2. This Writ Petition has filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and prayed for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this Writ Petition and kindly set-aside the impugned order and also direct restrain the purchaser from creating third party 3 interest in the suit land and also they may be restrained from interfering the possession of the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which this Court thinks fit & proper in favour of the petitioners, in the interest of justice & equity” 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this Petition may be disposed of directing the concerned trial Court to expedite the trial within a stipulated time frame. He further submits that on 20.09.2024, 6 months’ time was granted and later on, a PUD was received for extension of time. He would further submit that now the case has reached the stage of evidence. 4. Counsel for the other side would not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the concerned trial Court to decide the case in an expeditious manner, preferably within a period of 4 months. Ordered accordingly. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. 7. Meanwhile, interim relief granted on 16.10.2019 shall continue for a further period of 4 months. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka