Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39789 (BOM)

SEEMA VILAS GAIKWAD v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/2661/2025 · 2025-06-10

Shri Nitin W Sambre, Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 50-WP-2661-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2661 OF 2025 Seema Vilas Gaikwad ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Viresh V. Purwant a/w Mr. Kedar Nhavkar, for the petitioner. Mr. A. A. Naik, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 10th JUNE, 2025. P.C.:- . Heard. 2 The prayer is to direct the respondents to implead the accused by invoking the provisions of the MCOC Act. 3. When confronted, we are unable to get ourselves satisfied that the alleged offences were registered against the accused persons for pecuniary gain. Rekha Patil 1 of 2 REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2025.06.11 17:24:11 +0530 2 50-WP-2661-2025.odt 4. That means, no case is made out for interference on the ground of jurisdiction. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) (NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.) Rekha Patil 2 of 2