APHC010994432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 48038/2018 Between: 1. K.B.VARADA RAJULU, S/O K.B.BAGAWAN, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.11- 1-4, NEAR CHINNA MARKET, OPP. VENUGOPAL SWAMY TEMPLE, HINDUPUR TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (CIRCLE INSPECTOR), II TOWN POLICE STATION, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 515201. 6. H K PANDU RANGA RAO, S/O H.KRISHNAMURTHY RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.11-34- 33, KOTA, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DIDUGU GOPALA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.48038 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 2 to 5 to register the FIR against 6th respondent /accused in the complaint of the petitioner dt.15.11.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the provisions of the Cr.P.C and also contrary to the judgments of the Honourable Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumar’s case, violation of the Article 14, 19 (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 5 to take cognizance on the petitioner's complaint Dt.15.11.2018 by taking up appropriate investigation to submit the report and pass…” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 01.09.2025 Pmk 4 16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:48038 OF 2018 Date: 01.09.2025 Pmk