[2025:RJ-JP:3429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 905/2025 Nikki D/o Sanjay, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nearby Dharmashala Wali Gali, Gopal Pura Agra, Police Station Sadar Bazar Agra, District Uttarpradesh. (Accused Is Presently Confined In Jc At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1048/2025 Prahlad Singh S/o Dwarika Prasad, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kherari Police Station Kanchapur District Dholpur. At Present Confined In Judicial Custody At District Jail Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1049/2025 Pankaj Kumar S/o Jaysingh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Budhha Ka Pura Police Station Kanchanpur District Dholpur. At Present Confined In Judicial Custody At District Jail Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Awasthi in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 905/2025 and on behalf of Mr. Sachin Kumar in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 1048/2025 & 1049/2025 For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S.Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/01/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in [2025:RJ-JP:3429] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-905/2025] connection with FIR No.514/2024 registered at Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2), 308(7), 111(2)(a), 140(3), 115(2) & 61(2) (a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted amended cause title in criminal misc. bail application No.905/2025. Same is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. Counsel submits that petitioner in criminal misc. bail application No.905/2025 is a female and in custody since her date of arrest. Counsel submits that investigation is almost complete. Counsel submits that all petitioners are in custody since 31.12.2024. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruit purpose. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 7. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Nikki D/o Sanjay, Prahlad [2025:RJ-JP:3429] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-905/2025] Singh S/o Dwarika Prasad & Pankaj Kumar S/o Jaysingh shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. Any observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every three month in the concerned police station. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 11. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /217-219