Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39777 (KAR)

THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER v. SRI S R MANJUNATH

CRP/305/2019 · 2025-10-28

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42837 CRP No. 305 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 305 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER BSNL LIMITED, TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJBHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, BHARAT SANCHAR BHAVAN, HARISH CHANDRA MATHUR LANE, JANPATH, NEW DELHI - 110 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. Y. HARIPRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. S.R. MANJUNATH S/O.LATE S.R. RAMAIAH SETTY, NO.346, AVENUE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HARISHA O.K, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.18 OF THE SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.04.2019 PASSED IN SC.NO.1087/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XVIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EVICTION. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42837 CRP No. 305 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Memo reads as under: “The undersigned submits that after decree passed in SC No.1087/2018 dated 05.04.2018, that for after filing this CRP No.305/2019, the respondent under lease agreement dated 08.11.2019 under the new lease agreement and subsequent reneal of the lease of the property which is the subject matter of this case from time to time. In view of the same civil revision petition is not maintainable.” Present revision petition is filed challenging the eviction petition passed in SC No.1087/2018. As per the contents of the memo, after the present eviction decree, the parties have entered into fresh lease and the revision petitioners are continuing in the possession as fresh lessees. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42837 CRP No. 305 of 2019 Accordingly, petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27