4 APHC011000362017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 1284 OF 2017 Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 22-09-2017 in O.S. No. 210 of 2012 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ongole. Between; 1. Lekkala Mohan Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy Aged about 66 years, Occ: Business R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 2. Smt. Lekkala Lalitha, W/o. Mohan Reddy Aged about 64 years, Occ; Business Rio. Pedda Amberpet Village Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 3. Lekkala Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy S/o. Mohan Reddy, aged 42 years, Occ. Software employee R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4. Smt Chinthala Srilatha W/o. C. Deshender Reddy, aged 39 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H No. 2-9-57/3/2, Sai Nagar Colony, Bollaram, Secunderabad. 5. Lekkala Vijaya Ram Reddy S/o. Lekkala Mohan Reddy, aged 35 years, Occ. Employment, R/o. 12/373, Neerim Road, Carnegie VIC3163, Australia. Melbourne City, % Rep by his GPA Holder i.e., natural father Namely Lekkala Mohan Reddy (As per the Court order dated 05.11.2020 in I.A.No.2/2019 in A.S 1284/20 Proposed appellants No. 3 to 5 brought on record as Legal Representative deceased Appellant No. 2) ...Appellants (Plaintiffs 1 &2 in the lower Court) AND 1. M/s Sairam Granites, Presently represented by its Partners G. Jogi Reddy and Smt. Chendrakala R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 2. Ganta Jogi Reddy, S/o. Pedcji Reddy Aged about 54 years, Occ: Business R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 3. Smt Ganta Chandrakala, W/o. Ganta Jogi Reddy Aged about 47 years, Occ: Business R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 4. A P Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, represented by its Zonal Manager Industrial Estate, Nellore 5. Assistant Zonal Manager, A.P Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Industrial Growth Center, Gundlapally Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District 6. Director of Mines and Geology, B.R. Bhavan, Hyderabad 7. The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Near Koritapadu, Ramannapet, 1®‘ Lane, Guntur 8. Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Opposite Anjaneya Statue, N.H.5 Road(Old Bypass Road), Ongole (Respondents No. 5 to 8 are not necessary Parties to this Appeal) ...Respondents (Defs. No. 1 to 8 in the lower Court) lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Rule 32 of Civil Rules of Practie R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to represent on behalf of the 5*^ Respondent by virtue of General Power of Attorney given by the 5^*" petitioner in favor of the 1®^ petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M V Suresh Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri K B Ramanna Dora Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Sri A Sanjeeva Reddy The Court made the following: * APHC011000362017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 1284 OF 2017 Between: 1.LEKKALA MOHAN REDDY, S/0. RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/0. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT 2.SMT. LEKKALA LALITHA, W/0. MOHAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1.M/S SAIRAM GRANITES, PRESENTLY REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS G. JOGI REDDY AND SMT.OCHENDRAKALA R/0. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT 2.GANTA JOGI REDDY, S/0. PEDCJI REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC; BUSINESS RIO. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT 3.SMT GANTA CHANDRAKALA, W/O. GANTA JOGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC; BUSINESS R/0. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT 4.A P INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NELLORE I 2 5.ASSISTANT ZONAL MANAGER. A.P INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION CENTER MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 6.DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, B.R. BHAVAN, HYDERABAD 7.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, NEAR KORITAPADU, RAMANNAPET, 1ST LANE GUNTUR INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRIAL GROWTH LIMITED GUNDLAPALLY 8.ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, OPPOSITE ANJANEYA STATUE, N.1-1.5 ROAD (OLD (RESPONDENTS NO. 5 TO 8 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS APPEAL) BYPASS ROAD), ONGOLE ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal be allowed by setting aside the judgment and decree, dated 22-09-2017 in O.S. No. 210 of 2012 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ongole, with costs through out and be pleased to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner herein to represent on behalf of the 5th Respondent by virtue of General Power of Attorney given by the 5th petitioner in favaour of the 1st petitioner and to pass. lANO: 2 0F 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be. pleased To permit the petitioners 3 to 5 herein to come on record as appellants 3 to 5 in A.S. No. 1284/2017 being the Legal Representatives of the deceased 2nd petiitoner/2nd appellant in A.s. No. 1284/2017 and to pass. Counsel for the Appellant(S); 1.M VSURESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ASANJEEVA REDDY 2.K B RAMANNA DORA 3 The Court made the following Judgment: Sri M.V.Suresh, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the appellants are not interested to prosecute this Appeal any further and hence, a Letter dated 24.06.2025 was addressed to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. in that view of the matter, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District (with records) ^^One CC to Sri. M V Suresh, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. A Sanjeeva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. K B Ramanna Dora, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. Three CD Copies To. Stu sree HIGH COURT DATED: 30/06/2025 JUDGMENT A.S No.1284/2017 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS