THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH v. M/S.SRI VENKATESWARA CASHEW MANUFACTURES
TREVC/19/2018 · 2025-02-05
B Krishna Mohan, Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39773 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39773 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC011020182017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TAX REVISION CASE NO: 19/2018 Between: The State Of Andhra Pradesh M/s Sri Venkateswara Cashew Manufactures Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY TAX REVISION CASE NO: 19/2018 The State Of Andhra Pradesh AND M/s Sri Venkateswara Cashew Manufactures ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX Counsel for the Respondent:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3516] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT
2 HBKM,J & HVN,J
TREVC.No.19 of 2018
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
Heard the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes appearing for the petitioner.
2. This tax revision case arises against the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal in T.A.No.400 of 2007, dated 19.07.2017, wherein, the said appeal was partly allowed by setting aside the revision proceedings of the Deputy Commissioner (CT), Nellore, dated 06.09.2005 in R.V.No.1/05-06/A6 with regard to the adjustment of TOT levied on secondary sales of cashew kernel adjusting towards tax holiday.
3. Even according to the petitioner, the value of the tax revision case is Rs.24,120/- and there is no ground to interfere with the order of the appellate tribunal.
4. Hence, this Tax Revision Case is dismissed. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 05.02.2025 MDP