[2025:RJ-JP:26215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3562/2025 Dharamveer S/o Chhotalli, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Chinavda , Police Station - Gopalgarh, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Additional Director General Of Police ( Civil Rights), Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, District Deeg, Deeg, Rajasthan. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station- Gopalgarh, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 5. Mukeem S/o Kamal, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 6. Faisal S/o Kamal, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 7. Suka S/o Kamal, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 8. Afajal S/o Kamal, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 9. Raseedan W/o Kamal, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 10. Irfan S/o Nasru, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 11. Ahmed S/o Nasru, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. 12. Saddam S/o Nasru, Resident Of Village Chinavda, Police Station Gopalgarh District- Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Renu Verma, Adv. for Mr. Sudhindra Kumawat, Adv. For State : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 15/07/2025 1. The present petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS seeking directions for fair investigation of the FIR No.137/2024 [2025:RJ-JP:26215] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3562/2025] dated 18.08.2024 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offence under Sections 189(2), 103(1), 238(a) of BNS and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that FIR is lodged on 18.08.2024 against the accused persons, howsoever, police authorities are not conducting investigating in instant matter. Therefore, it is prayed that a fair and impartial investigation be conducted by the authorities in the instant matter. 3. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstance of the case, this Court, in light of the directions encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], directs that on 28.07.2025 at 11.00 AM, the petitioner shall mark his presence before concerned Superintendent of Police/competent authority who shall give audience to the petitioner and take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law and as per the facts. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /306