APHC011001792017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADEShU AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR " WRIT APPEAL NO: 1985 OF 2017^ Writ Appeal under clause IS^of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.11.2017 in WPNo.38848 of 2017 on the file of High Court. ^ Between: 1. Mymunnisa Begum, W/o. Ali Ansari, Muslim, Ponnur Village & Mandal, Guntur Dist. 2. Mohd Rafi Ali Ansari, S/o. Md. All Ansari, Muslim Pvt. Employee, R/o. Ponnur Village & Mandal, Guntur Dist. 3. Sk. Baba Zaieel Ansari, S/o. Md. All Ansari, Muslim Pvt. Employee. R/o. Ponnur Village & Mandal, Guntur Dist. Age;64 years, R/o. Age:35 years, Occ; Age;38 years, Occ; ...PETITIONERS/^ PROPOSED LEAVE PETITIONERS- AND 1. Abdul Aziz Ansari. S/o. Late: Shaik Maroof Ansari years, Occ: Business, R/o. Chandole Village, Pittalavanipalem Guntur Dist. Muslim, Age; 65 Mandal, 2. Salim Ansari. S/o. Abdul Aziz Ansari, Muslim, Age: 41 years, Occ; Business, R/o. D.No. 4-11-13, Vidyanagar, Ponnur Town, Guntur Dist. , ...RESPONDENTS/WRITPETITIONERS- 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Guntur Dist. 4. The District Registrar, tenali, Guntur Dist. 5. The Sub-Registrar, Pittalavanipalem, Guntur Dist. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS^ lA NO: 1 OF 2017(WAMP 3858 OF 2017^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Orders dt: 27-11-2017 in W.P.No.38848 of 2017 pending disposal of this Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G. RAMA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2:SRI P. V. N. KIRAN KUMAF^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE ^ The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APHC011001792ai7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WM TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 1985/2017 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order dated.27.11.2017 passed in WPNo.38848/2017 Between: 1.MYMUNNISA BEGUM, W/0. ALI ANSARI, MUSLIM, AGE; 64 YEARS, R/0. PONNUR VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 2.MOHD RAFI ALI ANSARI,, S/0. MD. ALL ANSARI, MUSLIM. AGE; 35 YEARS, OCC; PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/0. PONNUR VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 3.SK. BABA ZALEEL ANSARI, S/0. MD. ALL ANSARI. MUSLIM. AGE; 38 YEARS, OCC; PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/0. PONNUR VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1.ABDUL AZIZ ANSARI, S/O. LATE; SHAIK MAROOF ANSARI, MUSLIM, AGE; 65 YEARS, OCC; BUSINESS, R/0. CHANDOLE VILLAGE, PITTALAVANIPALEM MANDAL. GUNTUR DIST. 2.SALIM ANSARI, S/O. ABDUL AZIZ ANSARI. MUSLIM, AGE; 41 YEARS, OCC; BUSINESS, R/0. D.NO. 4-11-13, VIDYANAGAR, PONNUR TOWN, GUNTUR DIST. 3.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ,r' 2 RRRJ & TCDS,J ^ W.A. No. 1985 of 2017 BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 4.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. 5.THE SUBREGISTRAR, PITTALAVANIPALEM, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): [A NO: 1 OF 2017rWAMP 3858 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC . ,. . praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Orders dt: 27-11-2017 in W.P No 38848 of 2017 pending disposal of this Writ Appeal, and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2017fWAMP 3859 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to w Writ Appeal against the orders in W.P.No.38848 of 2017, dt: 27-11-2017 and Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.G RAMA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.P V N KIRAN KUMAR pass 3 RRR,J & TCDSJ W.A.No.1985 of 2017 The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) There has been no appearance for the appellants, on 22.04.2025 & 29.07.2025, when the matter was called. 2. There is no appearance for the appellants today also, when the matter was posted, under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 3. In view of the non-prosecution of the Appeal, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a . sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri G. Rama Sarma, Advocate [OPUC] — 2. One CC to Sri P. V. N. Kiran Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [C^T] 4. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 JUDGMENT WANo.1985 OF 2017 DISMISSING THE W.A. FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS