Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39767 (JHR)

IRSHAD ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1456/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36130-DB IN THE HIGHCOURT OFJHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1456 of 2025 Irshad Ansari, aged about 36 years, Son of Md. Jalil Ansari, resident of Village- Kanchanpur, P.O. and P.S.- Ranka, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Appellant : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Juhi Kumari, Advocate Mr. Viswajeet Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Alam, A.P.P. --- Order No.02/ Dated: 3rd December, 2025 1. Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.11.2025 passed in B.P. No. 340 of 2025 arising out of Meral P.S. Case No. 92 of 2024 by learned Sessions Judge, Garhwa, whereby and where under the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that the appellant who is a contractor, had taken away the son of the informant through his munshi by alluring him for providing a job at Chennai in a Solar Plant where the victim was subjected to abuse. 4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that it has been alleged that five victims were taken away by the appellant through his munshi and all the five victims have been recovered. Learned counsel submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and appellant is in custody since 22.09.2025. He has further submitted that the appellant has one criminal antecedent in a case under Section 420 of the I.P.C. 5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. 6. On consideration of the fact that the victims have been recovered and the period of custody undergone by the appellant, we while setting aside the order dated 10.11.2025 passed in B.P. No. 340 of 2025 by the learned Sessions Judge, Garhwa direct that the appellant be released on 2025:JHHC:36130-DB 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Garhwa in connection with Meral P.S. Case No. 92 of 2024. 7. This appeal stands allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated: 3rd December, 2025 Simran/- Uploaded on:- 06.12.2025